It Is A Blasphemous Interpretation Of The Holy Quran
By Shahina Mulk
For ages, the naked dagger of instant
talaq dangling over the heads of Muslim women has kept them terrorized and has
brought about extreme misery to divorced women. Social disabilities have been
clamped down upon them in the name of Muslim Personal Law, based on
dubious religious interpretation. Muslim women have been placed under the
fetters of customs and pseudo-traditions not sanctioned by Islam.
It is a popular fallacy that the Quranic
injunctions authorize a Muslim male an arbitrary, unbridled authority to
liquidate his marriage unilaterally in a single sitting. This practice of
instant divorce derives legal sanctions from the Muslim clergy, who ironically,
though, term it a great sin, validate it constitutionally.
Triple Talaq Has Brought About Extreme Misery To Divorced Women |
Though harsh, it is a naked truth that
Triple Talaq is seen as an instrument by the conservatives to keep their
females subdued and leave them with no other option, apart from capitulating meekly
to the whims and caprice of the masculine authoritarianism.
Islam in no way is to be blamed for
entailing a law, which brings immeasurable miseries to the weaker sex as this
practice does not finds roots in the original texts. It is a religion that has
always accorded women a status at par with men and its laws have been so framed
as to prevent masculine injustice against women. However, Muslim society under
the influence of a feudal ethos has never realized this revolutionary potential
of true Islam.
The abominable practice of Triple Talaq
in actuality is a blasphemous interpretation of the Quran. It goes against the
very spirit of the procedures of divorce laid down in the Holy Quran, which
emphasizes upon giving maximum time and opportunity for reconciliation. The
pronouncement of Talaq to be considered final must be delivered at three
separate intervals of one month each.
The Quran is replete with passages for proper and egalitarian
treatment to women. The practice of impulsively uttering Talaq thrice in a
single sitting or writing it thrice on a piece of paper is nothing but a
blatant violation of Allah's directives.
The Quran strictly forbids a man to seek
pretexts for divorcing his wife, so long as she remains faithful to him. The Islamic
law gives to the man primarily the right of dissolving the marriage if the wife
is guilty of some ‘open lewdness’ (adultery) and if she renders married life
unhappy. But in the absence of serious reasons, no man can justify a divorce.
If he abandons his wife or ‘puts her away’, he draws upon himself divine anger.
This practice has been looked down upon
by The Prophet and is said to earn the wrath of Allah. The Prophet states that “of
all things which have been permitted, divorce is the most hated by Allah.” Islam
discourages divorce in principle and permits it only when it becomes impossible
for the parties to live together in peace. It avoids, therefore, the greater
evil by choosing the lesser one, and opens a way for the parties to seek
agreeable companions and, thus, to accommodate themselves more comfortably in
their new homes.
Progressive Muslim Women Rre Rising To Take Up Cudgels Against The Regressive Practice |
Islam does not believe in unlimited opportunities
for divorce on frivolous grounds. Any undue increase in the facilities of
divorce would destroy the stability of family life. Therefore, while allowing
divorce on genuine grounds, Islam has taken great care to introduce checks and
balances designed to limit the use of available facilities.
The Muslim jurists who hold the opinion that three pronouncements in a single
sitting can have the effect of final separation, are definitely misled,
confused and have deviated from the teachings of the Quran. In fact, this
departure from the rules laid down by the Prophet, came into being during the period
of the second Caliph, Hazrat Umar, who reluctantly, according to the situation
prevalent at that time, allowed this practice of Triple Talaq in one session.
The Quran leaves open multiple opportunities for reconciliation. It says that
everything should be done to strengthen the social and spiritual aspects of
marriage. The Quran (Surat IV Al Maida Verse 35) states, “It is not for the
husband to put away his wife, it is the business of the judge to decide the
case. Nor should divorce cases be made too public. The judge is required to
appoint two arbiters, one belonging to the wife’s family and the other to the
husband’s. These two arbiters will find out the facts, but their objectives
must be to effect reconciliation between the parties. If all hope of
reconciliation fails, a divorce is allowed. But the final decision for divorce
rests with the judge who is legally entitled to pronounce a divorce.”
What Indian Muslims need is a
comprehensive code of true Islamic personal law. Most Muslim women are ignorant
and in the name of religion, they have been placed under the fetters of customs
and artificial tradition not sanctioned by Islam. If they receive proper Islamic
education, become conscious of their rights as well as their duties, they can
easily break their chains.
In The Spirit of Islam, the great jurist
Syed Ameer Ali wrote, “The Islam of Mohammad contains nothing which in itself
bars progress or the intellectual development of humanity.” He famously adds, “The
prophet inculcated the use of reason; his followers have made its exercise a
sin.” Badruddin Tyabji wrote that the dogma of past centuries, laboriously and
conscientiously elaborated by the most eminent divines and theologians, can no
longer serve our purpose. It was made for other times by other people.
Despite considerable public pressure,
the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has not only failed to ban the
practice and declare it null and void, but it has always been swift to take up
cudgels against anyone who stands up against this age old practice of meting
out injustice to Muslim women. Maybe this can be attributed to the conservative
Muslim psyche, which charges men with implicit power and women to slavish
relegation. The radicals, who dominate the board are groomed in a tradition of
extreme patriarchy, thus expectations of reform from them is a farce.
The double standards of AIMPLB, which
raises slogans of “Islam in Danger”, get exposed when they lay emphasis on
retaining Muslim Personal Laws in the Civil sphere, but never raise demand for
a separate Criminal Law as enshrined in the Holy Quran! Or do they believe in
passing religion through a sieve that separates the sweet from the sour.
We have to forge our own code by our own
study and understanding of the Quran in the light of our own needs. Islam when
expounded in its original rationalism without radicalism brings out a luminous
meaning of the great Prophet’s humanist teachings. One only needs to break
through the iron curtain of injustice-laden misinformation, which has been the
vested interest of status-quo religion and politics.
When even theocratic Islamic countries like Iraq, Syria, Pakistan and Lebanon have made it mandatory for the husband to satisfy the court about the reasons of divorce, how can this antiquated regressive practice of Triple Talaq be allowed here in a secular setup?
When even theocratic Islamic countries like Iraq, Syria, Pakistan and Lebanon have made it mandatory for the husband to satisfy the court about the reasons of divorce, how can this antiquated regressive practice of Triple Talaq be allowed here in a secular setup?
Turkey and Cyprus too have adopted
secular family laws; Tunisia, Algeria and the Malaysian State of Sarawak do not
recognize a divorce pronounced outside a court of law. And in Iran, triple
talaq doesn’t have validity under the Shia law.
Dubious religious interpretations with
values valid in a bygone age are being enforced today by civil courts in our
secular State, when those values have become mere legal superstitions. It is a
travesty of justice that despite, on and off, Indian courts declaring Triple
Talaq as unacceptable, in the absence of a uniform civil code, Muslim women are
forced to wait for years shuttling between courts for the rights granted to
them by their religion itself. This defeats the very cause of social justice.
Divorce should only be permissible if it fulfills the entire prerequisite
mentioned in the Quran.
Politicians in India, till now, have
only played interest-based politics, where party ideologies are sacrificed on the
altar of naked opportunism. They thought it prudent not to jeopardize
obscurantist Muslim votes for the sake of social justice to the weaker sex. For
long, social reforms have fallen prey to vote bank politics in India.
Muslim Women Have Voted For The Saffron Party In Hope Of A Reform |
The so called “secular political parties”
have been in symbiotic relationship with sundry Muslim organizations. The
arrangement has been such that both benefited from the status quo. While
Sharia was interpreted by these Muslim Organizations to assert their supremacy,
political parties thought it prudent to silently continue reaping electoral
benefits without getting caught within the web of controversy that could upset
their political equation.
While the less privileged class had come
to terms with it, accepting it as its destiny and Allah’s
verdict, the educated ones having an in-depth understanding of the Quran,
have gradually risen to guard their rights. A new chapter has got unveiled in
the history of Muslims in India, with progressive Muslim women breaking their
shackles and stepping out in large numbers to take up cudgels against injustice
meted out to them in the name of Muslim Personal Law.
A survey conducted by the Mumbai-based
Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan, last year, also suggests that nearly 92 per
cent of Muslim women want a total ban on oral unilateral divorce. Many cases
have come to light, where women are increasingly being divorced over media
platforms, such as Facebook, Skype, text messages and WhatsApp.
The bold steps that PM Narendra Modi has
taken in different sectors have ignited high hopes in hearts of these
women. Muslim women, especially in Uttar
Pradesh, have voted for the saffron party, pinning hopes on it for bringing
about a reform that removes this social anomaly from their lives. There is no
doubt they helped the BJP clinch 312 seats out of a total of 403 — the biggest majority for any party in Uttar Pradesh since 1980.
It is important to mention here that according to the 2011 census, Muslims make
up 18.5 per cent of the 200-million strong population of Uttar Pradesh.
Now, it’s high time the BJP government should step in and protect the rights of Muslim women from any arbitrary interpretation of Quranic injunction. It should not succumb to Muslim fundamentalists’ pseudo cry of “Religion in danger,” for the sake of social justice to the weaker sex. All eyes are set on the Modi government to deliver what it had promised to the Muslim women.
Now, it’s high time the BJP government should step in and protect the rights of Muslim women from any arbitrary interpretation of Quranic injunction. It should not succumb to Muslim fundamentalists’ pseudo cry of “Religion in danger,” for the sake of social justice to the weaker sex. All eyes are set on the Modi government to deliver what it had promised to the Muslim women.
The judiciary system in India too needs
strengthening so that women do not go through lengthy legal procedures
that tend to multiply their social and economic woes. Indian can never
stand tall as a democratic country if one section of its society continues to
be denied the Fundamental Rights of Equality and Justice.
0 Comments